\"arrow\"place: London - St. Sepulchre  p-link

casetypesource
1488-03-26: Alice Billingham  c. John (or Thomas) Wellis  MarriageLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS09065B7r-9r, 10r-11r, 15r-15v
1488-04-18: John (or Thomas) Wellis, Response of Defendant
Responds that during the last two years, he and Alice Billingham spoke together eight times in the presence of Billingham`s mother, brother, and Robert Best.

1488-06-17: Henry Stevens, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that about June 1487 Thomas Thomson told him that he had heard from his sister-in-law that John/Thomas Wellis and Alice Billingham were to be married and that she had asked him to come to the solemnization.

1488-06-17: William Hawkyns  c. Margaret Heed  MarriageLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS09065B11v-12v, 13r-15r
1488-07-01: William Flete, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies to having witnessed a future contract between his granddaughter Margaret Heed and William Hawkyns, 31 May 1488. Testifies that for the last four years, Henry Heed has claimed his daughter Margaret was free to marry of her own choosing. Testifies that on 29 May 1488, after the banns had been issued, Margaret Heed came to his house and claimed her father had forced her to marry Hawkyns and that she would never marry him. Testifies that he told Henry Heed that Copwode`s father told him Margaret loved his [Copwode`s] son more than Hawkyns, and that Margaret confirmed this when asked by her father. Testifies that she nevertheless seemed happy with William at the time of the contract despite her prior discontent.

1488-06-17: Margaret Heed, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies to having witnessed a future contract between William Hawkyns and her stepdaughter Margaret Heed on 31 May 1488. Testifies that Margaret Heed subsequently received gifts from Hawkyns, and that it was widely reputed in the parish that they were married. Testifies on the one hand that her husband Henry Heed had told Margaret that she must choose her own husband, at which time she confirmed that she wanted to marry Hawkyns, but on the other hand that he had beaten Margaret when she later said she would never marry Hawkyns.

1488-07-01: Gregory Brent, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that Margaret changed her mind about marrying William Hawkyns after banns had already been issued and that he had heard that her father, Henry Heed, beat her for having allowed the banns to be issued despite her change of heart. Testifies that Margaret Heed told him she was ashamed to speak to William Hawkyns after everything she had done to and said about him, and that, with her consent, he brought Hawkyns over to her house to discuss matters, and things between them were worked out. Testifies to having witnessed a present contract between Margaret Heed and William Hawkyns, 31 May 1488.

1488-06-17: Henry Heed, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies to having witnessed a future contract between William Hawkyns and his daughter Margaret Heed, 31 May 1488. Testifies that Margaret had gifts which Hawkyns had given to her after the contract, and that it was widely reputed in the parish that they were married. Asked whether he had compelled her, he said he had told her that she would not thrive if she did not marry Hawkyns.

1491-06-07: Robert Woode  c. Joan Patryk  DefamationLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS0906584rv
1491-06-07: Thomas Dod, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that he was present on 14 April 1491 when Joan Patryk accused Robert Woode of having stolen her purse on 25 March 1491. Testifies that Woode`s reputation has since faltered, that Woode has spent a good deal of money on the suit, and that he himself will continue to trust Woode less until he can prove his innocence.

1493-01-18: Joan Hancok  c. Henry Aprece  Malicious CitationLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS09065126v-129r, 141v-142r
1493-01-18: Thomas Hancok, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that he was present in court when Master William Imbroke`s request that Joan Hancok`s fees be remitted was denied and when Christopher Hancok, husband of Joan Hancok, promised to pay Henry Aprece his wife`s debt of 12d; also testifies to hearing that Master William Imbroke, following Masters Aprece and Richard Draper`s suspension of Joan, sought an inhibition from the Consistory court to prevent the judge, Aprece, and the curate of the church from further proceeding against her.

1494-03-04: John Fern  c. Henry Heed  DefamationLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS09065190v-191v
1494-03-04: Thomas Nelson, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that he was present, trying to mediate the conflict between them, when Henry Heed defamed his servant John Fern as a thief. Claims that he holds a lower opinion of Fern until his innocence is proven.

1494-03-04: John Philipps, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that he was asked by a certain smith to urge Henry Heed to be a more benevolent master towards Fern; testifies that he was present when Henry Heed, in response to his request, defamed Fern as a false harlot.

1494-02-28: John Grey  c. Josia Milner  MarriageLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS09065187v
1484-02-28: Josia Milner, Response of Defendant
Admits to marriage contract and solemnization with John Grey early 1491, but claims a previous marriage contract with John Nelson sometime before Christmas 1490.

1488-12-18: Thomas Wulley  c. Margaret Isot  John Heth  MarriageLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS0906548v-49v; 53v-55r
1489-03-09: Margaret Baron alias Harbard alias Spicer, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that she was present about 1 November 1471 when John Calton chided John Cracow for allowing Thomas Wulley and Margaret Isot to fornicate in his home; Cracow replied stating he did so because they were married, having himself, along with Robert Marley, witnessed the contract between them. Calton said that he wanted to be sure of the marriage, scolding Wulley that it was against his parents` wishes, but that Wulley and Isot affirmed they were married and there exchanged future consent again. Testifies also that she was present when banns were issued soon after. Testifies that John Heth and Isot lived together “for a certain time” as spouses in the parish of St. Giles.

1489-03-09: Joan Cracow, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that she witnessed a future contract between Margaret Isot and Thomas Wulley, early November 1471. Agrees with previous witness, Margaret Baron, except that she does not recall John Calton saying to Wulley that it was not his parents` will that he marry Isot. Testifies to rumours regarding Isot`s marriage to John Heth, and that she believed that Wulley had died.

1489-03-04: John Calton, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that in November 1472 Thomas Wulley`s father approached him, as the headborough (constable) of St. John`s Street, saying that he suspected that his son and Margaret Isot were fornicating. Testifies that their neighbours, too, had for months suspected they were fornicating. Testifies that he caught Wulley and Isot getting undressed in John Cracow`s house, and that when he threatened to take them to prison, they told him that they wanted to wed, and they exchanged future consent before him and the others present.

1494-12-10: Thomas Hudson alias Hodgeson, Elizabeth Hudson alias Hodgeson  c. Margaret Gerves  DefamationLondon Metropolitan Archives, MS DL/C/A/001/MS09065220v-221v, 230rv
1494-12-10: John Ingram, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that he was present on 8 September 1494 when Margaret Gerves defamed Thomas Hudson [and Elizabeth Hudson?]
1494-12-10: William Glew, Witness for Plaintiff
Testifies that he was present on 8 September 1494 when Margaret Gerves defamed Thomas Hudson [and Elizabeth Hudson?]